Behind The Mask: Partnership Challenges Of Community Wildlife Sanctuaries – The Experience Of Koija, Tiemamut And Kijabe Group Ranches, Laikipia County, Kenya PDF Print E-mail
Written by Administrator   
Wednesday, 03 August 2011 05:28

Muthiani E  N 1, Njoka J T 2 , Kinyua P I D 2 and  Gitau G  K 2

1 Kenya Agricultural Research Institute, Kiboko, P.O Box 12, Makindu

2 Department of Land Resource Management and Agricultural Technology, University of Nairobi. P. O. Box 29053 00625 Nairobi, Kenya

2Department of Clinical Studies, University of Nairobi, Kenya.

P. O. Box 29053 00625 Nairobi, Kenya

* Corresponding author: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it


Community Wildlife Sanctuaries (CWSs) is a Community Based Conservation (CBC) approach promoted in Kenya since the 1990s for wildlife conservation and as an alternative livelihood option in pastoral areas.  A study was carried out in Koija, Tiemamut and Kijabe group ranches in Laikipia North District, Kenya, with an objective of determining the reasons for the establishment of CWSs, the role of partners and the perception of the communities towards the partnerships. It was expected that the CWSs established in the late 1990s and early 2000s like these studied should have benefited from the experiences of those established earlier and also from the then ongoing intense criticism of CBC approaches globally on the argument that they were not producing the desired results.   Focus group discussions and key informant formal and informal interviews were used.  The study established that CWSs were established to help conserve wildlife and improve the livelihoods of the communities through non-consumptive wildlife utilization.  Two of the group ranches, Kijabe and Koija had tourism facilities all managed by entrepreneurs while Tiemamut was in an easement program brokered by an NGO.  However, it was found that communities in Kijabe and Koija were not contented with their partners and that they did not trust the partners. Further, despite previous research findings enumerating the weaknesses in CWSs established earlier, the same problems associated with CWS were identified in this study.  The partnerships were not transparent and returns to communities were low and therefore the likelihood of the CWS meeting the challenge of alleviating poverty was unlikely.  The CWSs studied were being run under an environment of mistrust which might threaten the sustainability of the partnerships and the projects in general. The study recommends that agreements or partnerships with communities be done only after asse of costs and profits have been done irrespective of who provides the initial capital. The inferred mistrust towards the entrepreneurs by the community in both Kijabe and Koija is worrying as partnerships are supposed to be based on trust. The need for the relationships to be mended cannot be overemphasized and was recommended if the projects were to be sustainable.

Key words: Agreement, Conservation, Entrepreneurs, Livelihood, Pastoral



Who's Online

We have 105 guests online

© Copyright 2014 The Kenya Arid and Semi-Arid Lands Programme (KASAL). All rights reserved